Friday, January 29, 2010
SIP Settings in QIP Infium Messager
SIP and XIMSS integrated in QIP
Friends! In order to many not mistaken, trying to catch Infium to Asterisk and other SIP-providers, clarify the following - the new QIP Infium does not support SIP as a protocol for communication and exchange of information (including voice). Точнее поддерживает, но только для связи с VoIP провайдерами, использующими сервер Commungate Pro, он же CGP - подробнее на www.Stalker.com . More specifically supported, but only in connection with the VoIP providers that use the server Commungate Pro, also known as CGP - More on www.Stalker.com.
XIMSS - a proprietary protocol CGP, or rather the management interface server from the client via XML. In our case Infium configured for server management of domestic VoIP-provider http://sipnet.ru.
Work directly with an asterisk, and other SIP-servers Infium CAN NOT!
Disgusting is that the standard SIP itself is defective. It simply is not designed for use in the real world. In the laboratory all the SIP UA are equally good.In complex conditions of modern local area networks (NAT, VPN, firewall) it works too, but not in 100% of cases. Even a small percentage of the impervious failures is large enough to cast a shadow on the vendor.
Therefore, companies are creating alternative interaction protocols (Skype, MSN, Yahoo, etc.) or added to the SIP incompatible extensions (Microsoft RTCDLL, Asterisk, eyeBeam, ...).
I have a question for you guys, I do not really understand these networks and technology transfer data, but I would understand if based on SIP (I still was convinced that this is only kleentsky interface) Infiun can connect to other VoIP networks such as VoIP Buster or something like that, which differs from Skype is not CODED. And if not, whether the planned development of QIP, in any of its interpretation, in the direction of commonly used networks, VoIP, which is not limited to companies, or working only in Russia and former Soviet countries?
I do not want to offend anybody, just so happens that so far in Russia organized a number of VoIP companies, each of which has its zamorochki and features and they are not compatible with each other: (But almost all of them have the same communication protocols as well as international (European American) companies VoIP, that's only compatible with them for some reason no.
Friends! In order to many not mistaken, trying to catch Infium to Asterisk and other SIP-providers, clarify the following - the new QIP Infium does not support SIP as a protocol for communication and exchange of information (including voice). Точнее поддерживает, но только для связи с VoIP провайдерами, использующими сервер Commungate Pro, он же CGP - подробнее на www.Stalker.com . More specifically supported, but only in connection with the VoIP providers that use the server Commungate Pro, also known as CGP - More on www.Stalker.com.
XIMSS - a proprietary protocol CGP, or rather the management interface server from the client via XML. In our case Infium configured for server management of domestic VoIP-provider http://sipnet.ru.
Work directly with an asterisk, and other SIP-servers Infium CAN NOT!
Disgusting is that the standard SIP itself is defective. It simply is not designed for use in the real world. In the laboratory all the SIP UA are equally good.In complex conditions of modern local area networks (NAT, VPN, firewall) it works too, but not in 100% of cases. Even a small percentage of the impervious failures is large enough to cast a shadow on the vendor.
Therefore, companies are creating alternative interaction protocols (Skype, MSN, Yahoo, etc.) or added to the SIP incompatible extensions (Microsoft RTCDLL, Asterisk, eyeBeam, ...).
I have a question for you guys, I do not really understand these networks and technology transfer data, but I would understand if based on SIP (I still was convinced that this is only kleentsky interface) Infiun can connect to other VoIP networks such as VoIP Buster or something like that, which differs from Skype is not CODED. And if not, whether the planned development of QIP, in any of its interpretation, in the direction of commonly used networks, VoIP, which is not limited to companies, or working only in Russia and former Soviet countries?
I do not want to offend anybody, just so happens that so far in Russia organized a number of VoIP companies, each of which has its zamorochki and features and they are not compatible with each other: (But almost all of them have the same communication protocols as well as international (European American) companies VoIP, that's only compatible with them for some reason no.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Portable Asterisk Download Link
Portable Asterisk Download Link the best on VoIP
Portable Asterisk for other devices, USB Drive and HDD, is continue..
Portable Asterisk for other devices, USB Drive and HDD, is continue..
VoIP on iPAD is REALLY! (NEW iPhone SDK now available)
MacRumors is reporting that the new iPhone 3.2 SDK, now available via developer.apple.com, but (currently?) only supporting the just-announced iPad, brings a couple interesting new features to the table tablet.
- External displays, which had potential but no official APIs in previous iPhone SDKs, looks like they’ve gone legit. Video out to come? No word on an HDMI cable still…
- Shared file directory, which mounts on both Mac and PC. It isn’t the Mobile Finder we’ve wanted, but it sounds like it might make getting docs on and off a whole lot easier.
- Universal apps, which means developers can make a single build that will support both the smaller iPhone and iPod touch, and the bigger iPad.
In addition, MacRumors says iCall Free VoIP [Free - iTunes link] has told them:
With the latest revisions Apple has made to the iPhone developer agreement and Software Development Kit, iCall for the iPhone and iPod Touch now enabled unrestricted free local and long distance calling over 3G data networks.
Finally (for now), 9to5mac shows that while the demo iPad only had 4 apps in its dock, like the iPhone, the SDK simulator has room for 6. Makes sense given the extra width. (Pictures above)
